首页> 外文OA文献 >Multicenter Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Test as a Rapid Screening Method for Detection of MRSA in Nares▿
【2h】

Multicenter Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Test as a Rapid Screening Method for Detection of MRSA in Nares▿

机译:造父变星耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)试验的多中心评估,作为一种快速筛选方法来检测Nares中的MRSA

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The first U.S. multicenter clinical trial to assess the performance of the Cepheid Xpert MRSA assay (Xpert MRSA) was conducted. The assay is a qualitative test designed for the rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) directly from nares swabs. This novel test combines integrated nucleic acid extraction and automated real-time PCR for the detection of a MRSA-specific signature sequence. A total of 1,077 nares specimens were collected from seven geographically distinct health care sites across the United States with prevalence rates ranging from 5.2% to 44%. Nares specimens were tested by (i) the Xpert MRSA assay, (ii) direct culture on CHROMagar MRSA medium (direct CM culture), and (iii) broth-enriched culture (Trypticase soy broth with 6.5% sodium chloride) followed by plating onto CHROMagar MRSA medium (broth-enriched CM culture). When direct CM culture was designated the reference method, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Xpert MRSA assay were 94.3%, 93.2%, 73.0%, and 98.8%, respectively. When broth-enriched CM culture was used as the reference method, the clinical sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the Xpert MRSA assay were 86.3%, 94.9%, 80.5%, and 96.6%, respectively. The BD GeneOhm MRSA (BDGO) assay was performed as a comparative molecular method. No statistical performance differences were observed between the Xpert MRSA and BDGO assays when they were compared to culture methods. From this large-scale, multicenter clinical comparison, we conclude that the Xpert MRSA assay is a simple, rapid, and accurate method for performing active surveillance for MRSA in a variety of health care populations.
机译:进行了美国首个评估Cepheid Xpert MRSA分析(Xpert MRSA)性能的临床试验。该测定是定性测试,旨在直接从鼻拭子快速检测耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。这项新颖的测试结合了集成的核酸提取和自动实时PCR技术,可检测MRSA特异性特征序列。从美国七个地理上不同的医疗场所收集了总共1,077个鼻孔标本,患病率从5.2%到44%不等。通过(i)Xpert MRSA分析,(ii)在CHROMagar MRSA培养基上直接培养(直接CM培养)和(iii)肉汤富集培养(含6.5%氯化钠的胰蛋白ase大豆肉汤),然后涂在CHROMagar MRSA培养基(富含肉汤的CM培养物)。当将直接CM培养指定为参考方法时,Xpert MRSA分析的灵敏度,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为94.3%,93.2%,73.0%和98.8%。当使用富含肉汤的CM培养物作为参考方法时,Xpert MRSA分析的临床敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为86.3%,94.9%,80.5%和96.6%。 BD GeneOhm MRSA(BDGO)测定法是一种比较分子方法。将Xpert MRSA和BDGO分析与培养方法进行比较时,未观察到统计性能差异。通过这种大规模,多中心的临床比较,我们得出结论,Xpert MRSA测定法是一种简单,快速,准确的方法,可以在多种医疗保健人群中进行MRSA的主动监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号